|
|
2003 Curve/Countercurve Survey Results
| Treating Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Instrumented vs Noninstrumented Fusion and Decompression |
|
Vertebral Osteomyelitis: Operative or Nonoperative Treatment?
|
| Web survey results for: Boden SD, Pennisi AE, Fischgrund JS, Fardon DF. Treating degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis: instrumented vs noninstrumented fusion and decompression. SpineLine. 2003;4(January-February):11-15. |
|
Web survey results for: Carragee E, Errico TJ, Fardon DJ. Vertebral osteomyelitis: operative or nonoperative treatment? SpineLine. 2003;4(March-April):16-19.
. |
|
1. If this were my patient, I would recommend (select one):
5% of respondents would recommend an instrumented posterolateral fusion 0% would recommend a noninstrumented posterolateral fusion
25% would recommend another type of surgery
0% would recommend no surgery |
|
1. My recommendation for management of the patient described in the case presentation (not the follow-up questions) is:
20% would recommend antibiotics only at this time
40% would recommend antibiotics and bracing at this time
9% would recommend operation now in addition to medical management
|
|
2. If the patient underwent fusion, the bone graft should come from (list all that apply):
20% chose option a only: the patient’s own iliac crest
30% chose option b only: the bone removed from the patient’s posterior elements
30% chose option c only: allograft or other prepared bone
10% chose option a and b
10% chose option b and c
0 chose option d: none of the above |
|
2. If this patient is treated surgically, I think the approach should be:
60% would recommend an anterior (thoraco-abdominal) approach
20% would recommend an anterior (endoscopic) approach
20% would recommend posterior stabilization
0 would recommend posterolateral debridement
|
| Cervicogenic Headache Treatment |
|
Cervical Spine Clearance in the Obtunded Patient |
| Web survey results for: Triano J, Donner J, Pettine KA, Schofferman J. Cervicogenic headache treatment. SpineLine. 2003;4(May-June):13-17. |
|
Web survey results for: Lindsey RW, Gugal Z, Chapman JR, Webb DJ, Mirza SK, Weinstein SM. Cervical spine clearance in the obtunded patient SpineLine. 2003;4(July-August):20-26. |
|
1. If this were my patient, I would recommend:
a. 48% would recommend medial branch blocks
b. 17% would recommend discography of C2-3, C3-4, C4-5
c. 13% would recommend both a and b
d. 22% would recommend neither a or b
|
|
1. If you are the spine trauma surgeon consulted on this hypothetical patient, would you:
31% would delay a final decision on cervical spine clearance until the patient was alert and able to cooperate regardless of imaging results.
61% would clear the patient’s cervical spine based primarily on your advanced imaging study of choice.
8% would clear the patient’s cervical spine based primarily on plain radiograph findings.
0 would clear the patient’s cervical spine based primarily on the current clinical examination. |
|
2. If medical branch blocks were negative and discography was positive at C2-3 and C3-4 but normal elsewhere, I would recommend:
33% would recommend ACDF at the two levels
38% would recommend long-term analgesic therapy
0 would refer back to a neurologist
29% would refer for ongoing chiropractic care |
|
2. If you are the spine trauma surgeon consulted on an obtunded patient, do you currently utilize a specific algorithm/protocol that includes advanced imaging to allow cervical spine clearance?
64% responded yes
36% responded no
|
|
DVT Prophylaxis in the Postop Patient
|
|
Exercise vs Manual Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain |
|
Web survey results for: Silber J, Fitzhenry L, Ludwig SC, Epstein O, Vacarro AR. DVT prophylaxis in the postop spine patient. SpineLine. 2003;4(September-October):19-23. |
|
Web survey results for: Triano J, Press J, Schofferman J. Exercise vs manual therapy for chronic low back pain. SpineLine. 2003;4(November-December):20-23. |
|
1. A 35-year-old patient is undergoing a posterior lumbar decompression and fusion with instrumentation and posterior iliac crest bone graft for an L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Would you:
10% use no prophylaxis
80% use mechanical devices only
5% use chemical prophylaxis only
5% use both |
|
1. If this were your patient . . .
23% would allow regular chiropractic care if the patient remained “active”
61% would institute a new exercise regimen that promoted independence from health care providers
6% would offer a surgical option
10% don’t know or are not sure
|
|
2. A 65-year-old patient with a history of CHF and prostate carcinoma is undergoing an elective posterior cervical decompression and fusion with lateral mass screws and local bone graft. Would you:
5% use no prophylaxis
65% use mechanical devices only
0 use chemical prophylaxis only
30% use both |
|
2. When prescribing physical therapy. . .
23% prescribe the type and directional bias of exercise based on the history of activities that either worsen or improve the pain
30% perform a directional biased examination and then prescribe the physical therapy based on clinical examination
47% write: “evaluate and treat” (leaving treatment decisions to the therapist) |
|
3. A 22-year-old patient sustained an L2 burst fracture requiring an anterior decompression and reconstruction as well as a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation. Would you:
11% use no prophylaxis
58% use mechanical devices only
5% use chemical prophylaxis only
26% use both |
|
|
|
4. A 52-year-old patient underwent an L4-5 laminotomy/partial discectomy for radiculopathy. He has a history of a DVT/PE five years previously following a total knee arthroplasty. A vena cava filter was placed at that time. Would you:
10% use no prophylaxis
35% use mechanical devices only
5% use chemical prophylaxis only
50% use both |
|
|
|