2005 Curve/Countercurve Survey Results
|
Cervical Disc Replacement versus ACDF
|
|
Utility of Provocation Discography in the Evaluation and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain |
|
Web survey results for: Janssen ME, Hilibrand AS, Wang JC. Cervical disc replacement vs ACDF. SpineLine. 2005;6(January-February):18-22.
|
|
Web survey results for: O'Neill C, Alamin T, Weinstein SM. The utility of provocation discography in the evaluation and treatment of chronic low back pain: a state of the art debate. SpineLine. 2005;6(March-April):17-25. |
|
1. What treatment would you recommend?
21% would recommend no surgery
11% would recommend anterior discectomy alone
9% would recommend posterior foraminotomy alone
23% would recommend anterior discectomy and fusion
36% would recommend cervical disc arthroplasty |
|
1. You have (please choose one) confidence that provocation discography is clinically valuable in this case.
47% full
40% some
13% none
|
|
|
2. Do you consider the patient in this case presentation to have a “normal” psychosocial profile?
67% yes
33% no
|
|
|
3. How often would you attribute a “failed fusion” to false positive discography?
17% always
20% frequently
46% sometimes
17% never
|
|
|
4. Do you expect to change your utility of discography based on this presentation?
37% no
43% yes, use it more
20% yes, use it less
|
|
ACDF: Inpatient or Outpatient?
|
|
ALIF or PLIF: Which Approach is Best for Fusion at L5-S1? |
| Web survey results for: Ghanayem AJ, Yonemura KS, Wang JC. ACDF: Inpatient or Outpatient? SpineLine. 2005;6(July-August):15-19. |
|
Web survey results for: Daubs MD, Chutkan NB, Wang, JS. ALIF or PLIF: Which approach is best for fusion at L5-S1? SpineLine. 2005;6(September October):14-17. |
|
1. Would you recommend this patient undergo this surgical procedure:
86% would recommend inpatient at a hospital
14% would recommend outpatient at an ambulatory surgery center
|
|
1. What fusion approach would you use for this patient? a. 58% would use ALIF alone b. 14% would use TLIF c. 14% would use PLIF d. 14% would use an anterior and posterior combined procedure e. 0% would use another approach |
|
2. If recommending a hospital-based procedure, your major reason is:
58% cite concern for medical risks
10% cite emergency coverage
22% cite access to assistance & equipment
5% cite ethical concerns
5% cite other: ie, acute loss of airway from hematoma or swelling
|
|
2. Would you consider other options for this patient?
17% would consider IDET
33% would consider disc arthroplasty
33% would consider two-level fusion
17% would consider alternative pain management
0% would consider other options
|
|
3. If recommending an outpatient procedure at an ambulatory surgery center, your major reason is:
71% cite patient satisfaction & preference for shortened stay
0% cite reduced facility fees
19% cite efficient environment
10% cite other: ie, all of the above
|
|
|
| Should the MMPI-2 be the Standard for Psychological Evaluation for Spine Care Patients? |
|
|
| Web survey results for: Block AR, Deardorff WW, Gatchel RJ. Should the MMPI-2 be the standard for psychological evaluation for spine care patients? SpineLine. 2005;6(November/December):13-18. |
|
|
|
1. Do you routinely use psychometric screening in the assessment of patients in whom you are considering fusion?
55% yes
45% no |
|
|
|
2. Do you use the MMPI-2 as the primary test for psychological evaluation?
40% some times
0 all the time
60% never |
|
|
|
3. If you do not use the MMPI-2 exclusively, what psychological evaluation tool(s) do you prefer:
12.5% prefer DRAM
12.5% prefer MMPI-2 and DRAM
25% prefer structured clinical interview
50% replied that it depends on the clinical presentation of the patient
0 indicated other |
|
|